4,3,2,1 RIP to US ( Final project)

           I always believed that the best art is the one you put yourself in and relate to the meaning of the art with your own body. The meaning for my drawing is to show that we are just number to the world we live in and nothing is going to change if we don't change it. i used a bar code because bar codes is the representation of data relating to the object to which it is attached and it is attached to us humans, it that we can't see it. The bar-code has people exiting the bar-code and run fun that us when we step up and stop being numbers.  


 What experience did you intend the viewer to have when looking at your work? Why did you want the viewer to have this experience? And how does this relate to the society that you lived in?
                  I intend to give the viewers an unique experience of mixed feels when they see my art. My work mostly targets everything we do and take everyday in our life, from people, rather then ourselves. I made a work of art that need to be ignored to understand the full meaning of it. The affects that this art should have when you look at it, is a reflection of a person you are becoming or was in your life. Everyone no matter what race they are should have a different meaning. My intend to achieve this effect by using people inside especially, the ego and their imagination.
One reason i want people to feel the mixture of feeling is so they could relate and impinge their inner-self. People today are to lay-back and take in everything that's thrown to them. i need people to get up and make a change in their life if they don't like what they are doing like the drawing yells we are all just a number.
This drawing has a big impacted in society because society is treating us like just number and not human. Today there are over 7 million people in the world and most are known though ss#or numbers given by their government, king or anyone in greater power. My art is to change that system and watch people wake up from a world they dislike.

Real life Downtown (reaction to Downtown 21 extra credit)

          


         Downtown 81 was a great movie because it covered new art like music, graffiti, praintings that was coming to the light and akin to frimming and real life. in the movie the first seen was with Basquiat in the hospital with an undisclosed ailment.  when jean was leaving the hospital he saw Beatrice , who drives around in a convertible and later start to search for her. Has Basquiat got home to his apartment, he discover that his landlord was kicking him out. so he starts walking around to try selling a work of art to make some income for his day to day life. Jean eventually does manage to sell some of his art work to a rich woman who is interested in more than just his art, but she pays with a check.  Moreover, has he was trying to sell his art work, he meets up with musicians and a band which becomes his own band. As the film progresses, he wanders the streets of New York, looking for Beatrice. He find a bag that is a lady who turns into a princess, after he kissed her. As a reward, she gives him a lot of money. 
             i found this movie covered it's ideas perfectly. i like the fact that they showed Manhattan has it really was a unruly place full of garbage, graffiti, rubble-strewn lots, unlicensed after-hours clubs and highly idealistic kids eager to make their mark as big artists and musicians. Like the movie Downtown 81, downtown Manhattan was they same way it was they didn't change a thing and that what i really liked about the movie.  

freaky mind only ( 18 and over please) MoMa ps1 reaction

  


                                  My visit to the MoMa Ps1 was very crazy and different from any other trip we took in the class. I really like this trip even if i went later on , but i wish i would for went there soon. Mike Kelley art was different in many ways. Kelley didn't approve of the society the way it was so he used his art to mock the community. Kelley used a lot of sexual and orgiastic art , but also used many colors and one item to show his art. When i hear the "moaning" in my head i was lost, like ' is someone having sex in here", it was his work of art. i believe Kelley work of art was to help people get out of their comfort zone , and to stop acting like if they don't have human needs. Another work of art that got my eye was the fruity colored teddy bears and the broken  glass, i like the fact that Kelly used one item to create a master piece like that. i believe his idea here was to tell use that we look having the some items over and over again. For example, clothes today i buy a black t shirt and tomorrow i buy a white one with Nike logo and next week i buy a red one that's polo at the end of the day it's the same items with different colors and names. in fact, Kelly made a new picture out of the colorful bears it was like a big monster. This give me the illusion for us and what we are becoming a monster. Kelly art was one of the best visit so far and also one of the most freaky one yet.

moma ( Magritte vs Dada ) we are family

Leopoldo liriano 

         My visit to the MoMa to see Rene Magritte art printings and watching the video on DaDa art was very  amusing. It showed me that both art aren't that much different in the meaning and that both art have similar characteristics that impacted their city during the time of birth. In fact, both are the same because both displays ideas of their society through different images.

         Magritte art was very interesting, his ideas was to show the art has a picture, and that art doesn't need meaning. So like that people could relate to it in many different ways. Magritte paintings of objects placed out of their usual context is related to that of DaDa. Dada was also a art that show no meaning in the art , but it did have entertainment and humor in it. Dada wasn't just of one person they were many loosely-knit group, like writers and artists that used any public forum they could find to talk on nationalism, rationalism, materialism. it's crazy how for both these movements, meant nothing and still impacted the people in the 1900's the way it did. The twain of these art introduced the meaning for nothings to their cities. 

.
Hannah Hoch  1919, oil printing. 


Magritte-The son of men,1964,oil printing 

 Magritte and Dada both used objects in their prints and always eliminated the true meaning of the objects and put another piece from a different object together to make art. Both artist used oil paint to create the work of art. in Magritte art he used a man and a apple, he replaced the mans face with the apple to recreate new meaning. in the picture of Dada they also removed oicture to create the picture, but the only thing is that in Dada they use more words. 

       Has you can see there is not much of a difference between Magritte and Dada because both separate piece from an object to put it in another project.     

why would i do this to myself ( One Perform )

 

 The meaning of this idea is to be one with nature and that we could live without any items.

Perform number two

The meaning to this art is fear vs self ... that one could face their fear by putting themselves in the fear itself.